Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/inc/ on line 123

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/inc/MODEL/generic/_genericelement.class.php on line 112

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/inc/ on line 306

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/inc/ on line 413

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/plugins/code_highlight_plugin/_code_highlight.plugin.php on line 528
The South East Asia SOA Weblog - Category: SOA Vendors in South East Asia

Category: SOA Vendors in South East Asia


Permalink 05:06:46 pm, by david Email , 873 words, 17094 views   English (US)
Categories: SOA Vendors in South East Asia

Oracle Dumps Itanium

To quote a line from a famous film …

“I love the smell of napalm in the morning” (Apocalypse Now).

To me those pearl handled pistols characterize Larry’s attitude toward all things great and small. We are kind of lucky that he doesn’t own any really critical infrastructure (like water or sewage). There is hardly a business partner in the world that remains unscathed by Oracle’s all or nothing attitude. So where does that leave our dear old friends Hewlett Packard? (… I can just imagine Bill and Dave turning in their graves RIP).

I am not a big fan or Itanium personally and I never have been but interestingly Intel as well as HP have never backed away from it and if we all remember, HP made a huge commitment to that platform when they announced that Itanium will replace their PA RISC architecture servers a few years back. Fact is that Intel remains committed to Itanium beside HP along with Huawei and Inspur announcing that they will also start producing Itanium based servers.

So therein lies the pivotal question… why would Larry want to leave this party?

If I had to meet HP to discuss this (unapologetically) on Oracle’s behalf then I could put it to HP that Itanium remains a smallish server platform by sales volume and that the Unix server market is kind of flagging and being slowly replaced by Lintel (Linux x86). This is a phenomenon that is in part to do with the fact that the relative power of x86 based systems has increased substantially with 64bit systems emerging at an unbeatable price point. Still feeling unapologetic…

In actual fact for the database world the current market situation for Unix servers is partially to do with Oracle themselves and their continuous evangelic marketing around Linux x86… (then they go and buy a Unix vendor! … work that one out).

I remember working with Oracle a few years back when they ramped up the Linux x86 marketing engine. Back then I was heading up pre-sales for Oracle in South Asia. During the 9i and 10g campaigns you could hardly hear anything but Unbreakable Linux being shouted from the podium. I also shouted it quite a few times myself on their behalf.

The years pass… and after a long hard endless winter in the business world you would have to be blind, dumb or both not to realize that a lot of your hard earned cash is being wasted on IT systems with a good portion of it now landing in Larry’s bank account. Many companies and people have awaken and started down the path of financial and functional enlightenment toward open source adoption. Obviously this trend is yet to completely change the landscape of IT vendor revenue but the vendors are definitely preparing for an inevitable tsunami. That is what cloud computing is designed to help them with (anyway… drifting a little off topic).

After spending 7.4 billion on Sun Microsystems (probably not just a favor to bail out Scott) I guess Larry may have suddenly realized that monetizing Java may not really be quite that easy after all (other than suing Google over Android… which gets some of his cash back). I get the distinct feeling that Larry thinks he needs to shift a bit of industry momentum back to Sun servers and try to polarize the database end of the whole server market with IBM (as well as taking HP down a few notches). Now that does sound more than just a little anti-competitive… I can just imagine every sales deal that they walk up to now starting to sound more like their friends at IBM used to sound (… hardware, software, services… and err… hardware).

So in summary… given the current server market situation, whipping the mat out from underneath HP’s feet seems like the logical path for Larry and is also consistent with the way in which our friends from Redwood Shores always like to do business (just ask some other recipients of this treatment… for example Red Hat).

Let’s face it sir… if you are not buying HP databases, applications or middleware then why the hell would you want to buy HP servers? It is time to wake up and smell the industry for what it is folks.

To quote another not so famous but nonetheless entertaining movie, if you are not taking open source database seriously then…

“your situational awareness kind of sucks” (The Perfect Getaway).

I believe that it is also high time to take a serious look at open source database and put some distance between your bank account and Larry’s. Of course we are more than just a little biased in this matter but we do believe that EnterpriseDB/Postgres is a natural choice for anyone seeking a DBMS platform on HP servers (or any other server) going forward. There has never been a better time to start. It is also a very good time to start looking at open source middleware (we like Geronimo… so does IBM) too before Larry decides to de-support WebLogic on Itanium too.

God save us all if Larry decides to walk away from Java on Itanium (… and other non-Larry hardware). Or at the very least god save HP.

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_feedback.php on line 102


Evaluating the Open Source SOA Opportunity

The solutions now offered in Open Source for implementing SOA have begun to provide extensive value but customers and systems integrators should be cautious and think strategically when assessing the value of these solutions. Projects such as WS02 and semi-open source (non-GPL, non-BSD, non-Apache) solutions such as Intalio BPMS are now comparable and even superior to many or even all their closed source counterparts. Considering some of the open source licenses offered by vendors it is necessary to take a cautious and well informed approach to open source offerings. Many of these solutions are contrived contributions that do not have a strong 3rd party developer community and are principally developed by one vendor with the dubious goal of proliferating their software and gaining the mind-share of the broader developer community. In my opinion the strategic focus of customers seeking open source solutions should be on those open source vendors licensing completely open and community driven software licenses along with support and subscription based licensing. In general customers should be cautions of vendors offering so called open source or community editions and a so called closed source enterprise edition. Watch this space for updates.

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_feedback.php on line 102


Permalink 08:34:56 pm, by Henry Chandra Email , 162 words, 52141 views   English (US)
Categories: SOA Vendors in South East Asia

Oracle BPEL PM + BEA ALBPM = Complete BPM Suite?

I just came back from BEA Welcome Event in Dharmawangsa Hotel, Jakarta last week (August 14, 2008). The event talks about the new product road map for Oracle middleware after the acquisition of BEA Systems.

Actually the road map has been made official since July 1st, 2008, complete webcast and presentation of the entire roadmap can be found in Oracle website here.

In the BPM area, as Bruce Silver predicted before in his observation, Oracle is trying to combine Oracle BPEL Process Manager and BEA Aqua Logic BPM into one integrated BPM solution. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is targeting the enterprise integration perspective with its support towards Web Service standard and BEA ALBPM is targeted towards workflow and business process optimization perspective.

At this moment, the two solutions still feel as separate solutions, with each of them has its own IDE and running environment, maybe Oracle will try to combine them in the future into one integrated framework for BPM. We’ll see how it develops.

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_feedback.php on line 102


Permalink 10:18:54 am, by Henry Chandra Email , 216 words, 9822 views   English (US)
Categories: SOA Vendors in South East Asia

What do Oracle and BEA have in mind for their BPM offering?

In a recent observation made by Bruce Silver in Intelligent Enterprise (, he talks about the future of BPM at Oracle/BEA after the acquisition.

Bruce made an interesting observation about two points of view of looking at BPM solution, one is from integration middleware perspective, the other is from optimization of workflow and business performance.

It looks to me that one is looking at BPM bottom up, while the other is looking at it top down. Oracle and BEA adopts these two different point of views for BPM. Oracle’s approach is more towards looking at BPM from integration perspective, transforming enterprise applications from old-style monoliths to composable services. BEA sees BPM from the straight BPM perspective, from workflow and business performance optimization perspective.

At this point, it is too early to tell what approach will be taken by the Oracle/BEA BPM offering. Bruce Silver predicts that it is possible Oracle will maintain both product lines while still figuring out what to do with them. There will be a Webcast on July 1st 2008 by Oracle President Charles Phillips and Oracle Senior Vice President Thomas Kurian that will explore about the addition of BEA products to Oracle Fusion Middleware. We shall then see what will happen…

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_feedback.php on line 102


Permalink 12:00:40 pm, by Henry Chandra Email , 96 words, 2810 views   English (US)
Categories: SOA Vendors in South East Asia

Changes in SOA Political Map

Oracle to acquire BEA Systems

With Oracle acquisition of BEA Systems, there’s a major change in SOA solution provider political map. What once are competitors in SOA solution provider landscape now joint under one umbrella, the mighty Oracle. BEA’s strong hold on Telco industry will strengthen Oracle’s grip over that sector.

What will happen to BEA AquaLogic product line after the acquisition? As Larry Ellison puts it, BEA and Oracle solutions will co-exist and integrated, instead of merged. Will Oracle be competing with itself when marketing either e.g. Oracle BPEL PM vs. BEA AquaLogic BPM?

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_feedback.php on line 102

:: Next Page >>

Hosted by:
hosted by PWS Consulting

The South East Asia SOA Weblog

The intention of this blog is to collect thoughts on the issues, paradigms, process, vendors, solutions, project and any other item related service oriented architecture in South East Asia.

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/plugins/_calendar.plugin.php on line 135
September 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29


Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/pwsconsu/public_html/blog/skins/_linkblog.php on line 46

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 450